Trends in Library Expenditure of Top Indian Colleges in Recent Years: A Statistical Analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2025/v62i6/171425

Keywords:

Academic Library, Capital Expenditure, College Library, Library Expenditure, NIRF, NAAC

Abstract

It is said that library is the central organ of any educational institute. However, the prominence is not visible from the financial allocation for academic libraries in India. In recent years, due to assessments, accreditation issues, rankings, etc., colleges and universities have been forced to allocate a certain percentage of their annual budget for the library. This process has brought some standardisation and consistency in the budgetary allocation for academic libraries. In this study, the top 100 colleges according to the NIRF ranking 2023 were considered, focusing on the trends in library expenditures. The study compares the trend in library expenditure of different kinds of colleges classified according to certain criteria. It also tries to assess the impacts of library expenditure on the NIRF rankings. The analysis shows that the average per capita library expenditure of the top 100 Indian colleges is ₹370.52, while the figure is ₹519.75 in the case of the top 25 colleges. The study also reveals that the library expenditure has a negligible impact on the NIRF score. The findings of this paper indicate some benchmarks for the colleges willing to have better grades or rank in future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Adhikary, B. (2025). Trends in Library Expenditure of Top Indian Colleges in Recent Years: A Statistical Analysis. Journal of Information and Knowledge, 62(6), 433–445. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2025/v62i6/171425

References

Andres, M. (2019 Aug 22-23). Measurement of academic library outcomes towards achieving institutional outcomes of State Universities and Colleges (SUCs) in the Philippines. IFLA World Library and Information Congress 2019 (pp. 1-47). University of Piraeus, Greece, Athens.

Chigateri, N., & Jange, S. (2017). NAAC indicators and government degree college libraries of North Karnataka: A study. International Journal of Library Science and Research, 7(4), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.24247/ijlsraug20173

Foote, S. (1993). [Quotation]. North Carolina Libraries, 51(4), 162.

Ghumre, S., & Veer, D. (2013). College library services in Marathwada Region: A study on the impact of NAAC accreditation. 9th International CALIBER - 2013 (pp. 265273). Gandhinagar: INFLIBNET Centre.

Ghumre, S., Veer, D., & Kalbande, D. T. (2013). Expenditure of college library budgets in Marathwada region: A case study. International Journal of Digital Library Services, 3(1), 23-32.

Gohain, M. P. (2022). Accreditation is a must for higher education institutes to get govt aid now. Delhi: Times of India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/accreditation-a-mustforhigher-education-institutes-to-get-govt-aid-now/articleshow/92687266.cms

India Rankings 2023: College. (2023). Retrieved `2024, from National Institutional Ranking Framework: https://www.nirfindia.org/Rankings/2023/CollegeRanking.html

Kumar, A., Singh, K., & Siwach, A. K. (2021). NIRF India Rankings 2020: Analyzing the ranking parameters and score of top 100 universities. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 41(5), 385-390. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.41.5.16452

Kumar, V., Balaji, B. P., & Monika. (2021). Correlates of the national ranking of higher education institutions and funding of academic libraries: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(1), Article 102264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102264 PMCid:PMC7996087

Ministry of Education, Government of India. (2024). All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE). https://aishe.gov.in/aishe/home

Ministry of Education, Government of India. (2024). Methodology for Ranking of Academic Institutions in India. Retrieved May 2024, from National Institutional Ranking Framework: https://www.nirfindia.org/Docs/Ranking_Methodology_And_Metrics_2017.pdf

Ministry of Education, Government of India. (n.d.). National Institutional Ranking Framework. https://www.nirfindia.org/Home/Index

National Assessment and Accreditation Council. (2020-21). AQAR Guidlines. http://naac.gov.in/images/aqar_online_20-21/apr292022/2AQAR-Guideline_Autonomous-Colleges.pdf

National Assessment and Accreditation Council. (2024a). Assesment and accreditation. http://naac.gov.in/index.php/en/assessment-accreditation#criteria

National Assessment and Accreditation Council. (2024b). Home page. http://www.naac.gov.in/index.php/en/

Naveen, C. L., & Kannappannavar, B. U. (2020). Impact of NAAC assessment on the development of college libraries: A study. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4190/

Naveen, P. (2023). How to get your institution into the top 200 in NIRF ranking? IEEE Transactions on Education, 18(9). https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.23443112

Prathap, G. (2018). NIRF 2018 ranking of colleges.

Prathap, G. (2019). Construct validity maps and the NIRF 2019 ranking of colleges. Current Science, 117(6), 1079-1083. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v117/i6/1079-1083

Sengupta, S. S. (2021). NAAC accreditation and responsibility of college libraries in India. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/6290/

Singh, H., & Mahajan, P. (2017). Relationship between budget allocation and growth of resources at the university libraries of Northern India – A study. Collection Building, 36(3), 127-134. https://doi.org/10.1108/CB-01-2017-0005

Singh, S., & Pandita, R. (2017). Impact of library spending on the research output of the institution. Library Management, 38(8/9), 437-454. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-12-2016-0092

Sivakumar, C. (2017). Role of NAAC policy in college libraries for maintaining quality. International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field, 3(9), 96-98.

Van Reenen, J. (2001). Library budgets and academic library rankings in times of transition. The Bottom Line, 14(4), 213-219. https://doi.org/10.1108/08880450110408490