Enhancing Web Accessibility for Specially Abled Users: An Evaluation of Top-Ranked Open Universities in India according to WCAG Standards

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2025/v62i4/171604

Keywords:

Accessibility, Digital Inclusivity, Digital Resources, Open University Specially Abled Users, WCAG Compliance

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the digital accessibility of websites from top-ranked open universities in India, evaluating their compliance with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). The focus is on understanding how these institutions adhere to WCAG principles and identifying the accessibility challenges faced by specially abled users. The study examines universities ranked by the latest National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF), emphasising the importance of Open and Distance Learning (ODL) and online modes, which are vital for students with physical disabilities. Access to digital resources is crucial for these users, and the university website is often the first point of access. Methodology: The study involves a comprehensive review of WCAG principles and a structured survey of top-ranked Indian open university websites. These websites were evaluated for compliance with WCAG standards. The analysis focused on identifying patterns and gaps in digital accessibility. Findings: The evaluation of three prominent open universities in India reveals varying levels of adherence to WCAG standards. IGNOU demonstrates a balanced performance. NSOU, on the other hand, faces significant challenges. BAOU presents a moderate level of compliance. The study underscores the need for continuous efforts to ensure that higher education websites are fully inclusive and accessible to all students, regardless of their abilities. Value: This study offers a detailed analysis of digital highlighting, including both strengths and areas for improvement. It underscores the importance of accessible digital experiences for specially abled users in higher education, particularly in accessing resources through ODL and online education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2025-08-01

How to Cite

Das, S., & Bhattacharya, U. (2025). Enhancing Web Accessibility for Specially Abled Users: An Evaluation of Top-Ranked Open Universities in India according to WCAG Standards. Journal of Information and Knowledge, 62(4), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2025/v62i4/171604

Issue

Section

Articles

References

Ahmi, A., & Mohamad, R. (2016). Evaluating accessibility of Malaysian ministries’ websites using WCAG 2.0 and Section 508 Guideline. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 8(8), 177-183.

Akgul, Y. (2017). The most violated WCAG 1.0 guidelines by the developers of university websites in Turkey. Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies. https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI.2017.7976007

Akram, M., Ali, G., A., Sulaiman, A., & ul Hassan, M. (2022). Accessibility evaluation of Arabic University websites for compliance with success criteria of WCAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0. Universal Access in the Information Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00921-8

Akram, M., & Sulaiman, R. B. (2019). Comparative web accessibility evaluation of Saudi government websites for compliance with WCAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0 using automatic web accessibility tools. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 97(10), 2656-2668.

Al Mourad, M. B., Hussein, M., Kamoun, F., & Wattar, Z. (2019). Analysis of WCAG 2.0 data accessibility success criterion of e-government websites. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 7(1), 496-503. https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v7i1.432

Alonso, F., Fuertes, J. L., Gonz, A .L., & Mart, A, I. (2010). Evaluating conformance to WCAG 2.0: Open challenges. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 6179 LNCS(PART 1), 417-424. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14097-6_67

Brajnik, G., Yesilada, Y., & Harper, S. (2010). Testability and validity of WCAG 2.0: The expertise effect. ASSETS’10 - Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. https://doi.org/10.1145/1878803.1878813

Brajnik, G., Yesilada, Y., & Harper, S. (2012). Is accessibility conformance an elusive property? A study of validity and reliability of WCAG 2.0. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1145/2141943.2141946

Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Open University. (n.d.). https://baou.edu.in/

Duchateau, S., Boulay, D., & Burger, D. (2010). Assessing WCAG 2.0 conformance in practice. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 6179 LNCS(PART 1), 408-412. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3642-14097-6_65

IGNOU - The People’s University. (n.d.). http://www.ignou.ac.in/

Isa, W. A. R. W. M., Suhaimi, A. I. H., Ariffrn, N., Ishak, N. F., & Ralim, N. M. (2017). Accessibility evaluation using Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG ) 2.0. Proceedings - 2016 4th International Conference on User Science and Engineering, i-USEr 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/IUSER.2016.7857924 PMCid:PMC5256041

Kumar, S., Shree, D. V. J., & Biswas, P. (2021). Comparing ten WCAG tools for accessibility evaluation of websites. Technology and Disability, 33(3), 163-185. https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-210329

Li, S.-H., Yen, D. C., Lu, W.-H., & Lin, T.-L. (2012). Migrating from WCAG 1.0 to WCAG 2.0 - A comparative study based on Web Content Accessibility Guidelines in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.014

MoE, National Institute Ranking Framework (NIRF). (n.d.). https://www.nirfindia.org/Rankings/2024/OPENUNIVERSITYRanking.html

Nietzio, A., Eibegger, M., Goodwin, M., & Snaprud, M. (2012). Following the WCAG 2.0 techniques: Experiences from designing a WCAG 2.0 checking tool. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 7382 LNCS (PART 1), 417-424. https://doi.org/10.1007/9783-642-31522-0_63

Patra, M. R., & Dash, A. R. (2018). Accessibility of Indian government web portals with respect to WCAG 2.0 and GIGW guidelines. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209415.3209506

Reid, L. G., & Snow-Weaver, A. (2009). WCAG 2.0 for designers: Beyond screen readers and captions. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 5616 LNCS (PART 3), 674-682. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02713-0_71

Sandnes, F. E. (2022). Is there an imbalance in the supply and demand for universal accessibility knowledge? Twenty years of UAIS papers viewed through the lens of WCAG. Universal Access in the Information Society, 21(2), 333-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-021-00834-y

Sayago, S., Camacho, L., & Blat, J. (2009). Evaluation of techniques defined in WCAG 2.0 with older people. W4A 2009 - International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, 79-82. https://doi.org/10.1145/1535654.1535673

Velleman, E., Strobbe, C., Koch, J., Velasco, C. A., & Snaprud, M. (2007). A unified Web evaluation methodology using WCAG. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 4556 LNCS (PART 3), 177-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73283-9_21

Verkijika, S. F., & De Wet L. (2017). Determining the accessibility of e-government websites in sub-Saharan Africa against WCAG 2.0 standard. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 13(1), 52-68. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2017010104

Welcome to Netaji Subhas Open University. (n.d.). https://www.wbnsou.ac.in/index_web.shtml

Most read articles by the same author(s)