Classification in the Wider Philosophical Perspective of Informational Ontology. Lecture 1: Bibliographic Classifications
Authors
-
University of Pavia
Claudio Gnoli
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2025/v62i2/171793Keywords:
Bibliographic Classification, Classificatory Principles, Knowledge Organization, Knowledge Organization Systems, Philosophical OntologyAbstract
Authors in library and information science like Dewey, Otlet, Bliss, Ranganathan, Vickery, Kyle, Foskett, Austin and Dahlberg have developed a rich corpus of classification theory and practice, covering important techniques like hierarchical subdivision, facet analysis and ordering of arrays by integrative levels. The advent of digital information offers an opportunity to organize information using such techniques; but this heritage has often been forgotten in the illusion that automation has made it unnecessary. Nowadays bibliographic classification is subsumed in the field of knowledge organization, which covers the conceptual ordering of contents in libraries, archives, museums, digital collections and knowledge in general. We propose a broad view of knowledge organization as an intellectual guide to learning and scholarship grounded in philosophical ontology. Established classification principles can contribute their techniques for the production of general schemes of phenomena.
Downloads
References
d’Alembert, J. l. (1751). Discours préliminaire, Vol. 1, Translation: Preliminary discourse to the Encyclopedia of Diderot (pp. 3-140), R. N. Schwab with the collaboration of W. E. Rex, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Biagetti, M. T. Ontologies as knowledge organization systems. Knowledge Organization, 48(2), 152-176. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2021-2-152
Bianchini, C., Luca, G., & Claudio, G. (2017). The APUPA bell curve: Ranganathan’s visual pattern for knowledge organization. Les cahiers du numérique, 13(1), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.3166/lcn.13.1.49-68
Bliss, H. E. (1929). The organization of knowledge and the system of the sciences, Holt, New York.
Bliss, H. E. (1933). The organization of knowledge in libraries and the subject approach to books, Holt, New York.
Broughton Vanda, Henry Evelyn Bliss, in Hjørland B. - Gnoli C. eds., ISKO encyclopedia of knowledge organization, https://www.isko.org/cyclo/bliss 2020.
Brzović, Z. (2018). Natural kinds. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/nat-kind
Buckland, M. K. (2024). Known item search and subject search. Library Resources and Technical Services, 68(3). https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.68n3.8132
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.). https://doi.org/10.21236/AD0616323 PMid:14125365
Classification Research Group. (1955). The need for a faceted classification as the basis for all methods of information retrieval. Library Association Record, 57(7), 262-268.
Classification Research Group. (1961). Bulletin no. 6. Journal of Documentation, 17(3), 164-172. https://doi.org/10.1108/ eb026306
Classification Research Group. (1968). Bulletin no. 9. Journal of Documentation, 24(4), 273-298. https://doi.org/10.1108/ eb026459 Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical semantics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Dahlberg, I. (1978). Ontical structures and universal classification. Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science, Bangalore.
De Beaugrande, R.-A., & Dressler, W. (1978). Introduction to text linguistics, Longman, London, New York.
de Sales, R., & Pires, T. (2017). The classification of Harris: Influences of Bacon and Hegel in the universe of library classification. Proceedings from North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization, 6, 56-66. https://doi.org/10.7152/nasko.v6i1.15230
Dupré, J. (1993). The disorder of things: Metaphysical foundations of the disunity of Science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.).
Gnoli, C., Golub, K., Haynes, D., Salaba, A., Shiri, A., & Slavic, A. (2024). Library catalogue’s search interface: Making the most of subject metadata. Knowledge Organization, 51(3), 169-186. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2024-3-169
Douglas, J. F. (1978). The theory of integrative levels and its relevance to the design of information systems. Aslib Proceedings, 30(46), 202-208. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb050633
Gnoli, C. (2024). Ranganathan’s principles and a truly “freely faceted” classification. Annals of Library and Information Science, 71(1), 107-114, https://or.niscpr.res.in/index.php/ ALIS/article/view/8996
Hartmann, N. (1953). New ways of ontology, Regnery, Chicago.
Hjørland, B. (2013). Facet analysis: The logical approach to knowledge organization. Information Processing and Management, 49(2), 545-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2012.10.001
Hjørland, B. (2015). Theories are Knowledge Organizing Systems (KOS). Knowledge Organization, 25(4), 162-201. https://www.isko.org/cyclo/theory
Hjørland, B. (2017). Domain analysis. Knowledge Organization, 44(6), 436-464. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2017-6436
Khalidi, M. A. (2023). Natural kinds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009008655
Kleineberg, M. (2017). Integrative levels. Knowledge Organization, 44(5), 349-379. https://doi.org/10.5771/09437444-2017-5-349
Magnus P. D. (2013). Scientific inquiry and natural kinds: From planets to mallards, Palgrave - Macmillan, New York.
Minelli, A. (2023). Linear listing order and hierarchical classification: History, conflict, and use. European Journal of Taxonomy, 908(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2023.908.2331
Novak, J. D. (2010). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations, 2nd ed., Routledge, New York, London.
Perović, K. (2024). Ontological categories: A methodological guide, Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108973861
Ranganathan, S. R. (1967). Prolegomena to library classification, 3rd ed., Asia Publishing House, Bombay.
Rayward, W. B. (1998). Electronic information and the functional integration of libraries, museums, and archives. In H. Edward (Ed.), History and electronic artefacts (pp. 207-226), Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Satija, M. P., & Dinesh, K. G. S R Ranganathan: Making of the man and his method. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 71(1), 11-24. https://or.niscpr.res.in/index.php/ALIS/article/view/8930
Sebastiani, M. M., & Emanuela, V. (2023). Educare alla lettura con il metodo Ma.Vi., 2. ed., Amazon Italia, Torrazza.
Shera, J. H. (1950). Classification as the basis of bibliographic organization (pp. 72-93). In H. S. Jesse, & E. E. Margaret (Eds.), Bibliographic organization. Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Graduate Library School, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. https://www.isko.org/cyclo/se-shera1951.pdf
Soergel, D. (2013). Knowledge organization for learning: Conjectures and methods of study. Ciência da informacão, 42(2), 232-254, https://doi.org/10.18225/ci.inf.v42i2.1384
Thagard, P. (1993). Conceptual revolutions, Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691186672
Vickery, B. C. (1960). Faceted classification: A guide to the construction and use of special schemes, Aslib, London.
Whitley, R. R. (1984). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Information and Knowledge
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All the articles published in Journal of Information and Knowledge are held by the Publisher. Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science (SRELS), as a publisher requires its authors to transfer the copyright prior to publication. This will permit SRELS to reproduce, publish, distribute and archive the article in print and electronic form and also to defend against any improper use of the article.
